After the tremendous advancements and achievements made during the third
millennium in the field of genetics, we are now in a better position to assess
the chances for macroevolution of evolution theory to have occurred during the
history of the universe.
Science has
accomplished enormous progress and achievements in genetics since the turn of
the 21stcentury. Scientists have
sequenced and mapped the entire genomes of more than 2800 organisms/species
including human, and the count is on.[1]
Macroevolution
of evolution theory tells us that humans, as well as other multicellular forms
of life, have evolved from primitive single-celled organisms that fall under
the kingdom of prokaryotes or even more primitive.[2] Prokaryotes are single-celled organisms that
have no true nucleus as their genome is not contained within a membrane nor
distinct from the rest of the cell. They
are the earliest and most primitive forms of life found on earth.[3] Is there a chance for this evolution to have
taken place from a simple, single cell to a human being during the age of the
universe?
The human
genome[4] contains approximately 3
billion chemical nucleotide base pairs (A, C, T, and G).[5] Approximately 34 million nucleotide bases of
the human genome encode for the production of proteins that are vital to all
living processes.[6] These 34 million
nucleotides are called genes. Proteins
are made of amino acids. Each amino acid
is encoded for by a codon, and each codon is composed of 3 nucleotides.
You can think of nucleotides as alphabets of 4 letters pool,
and codons as words of 3 letters length.
The sequence of these nucleotides within genes is what defines
the characteristics and functions of a living organism and its nature; will it
be a bacterium, a plant, a fly, a fish, or a human. The sequence of this coding in human genes,
as well as other organisms, is so sophisticated, precise, and well organized
that it is comparable to the sequence of alphabets in a Shakespeare’s poem, a
novel, a thesis, a computer program, or an encyclopedia of 2 million words (or
2 volumes).
According to macroevolution, this precise sequence, coding,
has come into being by random mutations[7]
and natural selection.
Maximum Possible Mutations During the Age of the Universe
We will try to find out here the maximum number of mutations
that can occur during the age of the universe based on assumptions that favor
evolution.
The maximum number of mutations a human genome can undergo
during its course of evolution from a single cell to a human is 3 billion
mutations per generation since that is the largest size the genome of mammals
has reached. This is an extreme
assumption in favor of evolution. In
reality, mutation rate ranges approximately between 0.003 and 350 mutations per
genome per generation.[8]
The shortest generation time reported to date is the
generation ofPseudomonas natriegens, a marine bacterium with a generation time
of 9.8 minutes.[9] Nevertheless, going
once again to the utmost in favor of evolution, we can assume that we are
getting a new generation every one second.
Thus, during the age of the universe,[10] which is about 15 billion years,[11] the maximum number of generations that can be
reached is:
Universe age in years × Days per year × Seconds per day
15 billion × 365 × 86400
which equals less than 1018 generations (1 with 18 zeros
after it).
The last piece of information needed to calculate the maximum
number of possible mutations is the population of these single-celled
organisms. For that we will assume a
very large number that leaves no place for more; the number of atoms in the
observable universe that is about 1082.[12]
Thus, based on previous results and generous assumptions,
the maximum number of mutations that may occur in the entire universe and
during its age is:
Mutations per generation × Generations during universe age ×
Population
3 billion × 1018 × 1082
which equals less than 10110 mutations (1 with 110 zeros
after it).
Number of Random Mutations Required for the Evolution into a
Human
The genes of human genome consist of approximately 34
million nucleotides.[13]
The largest genome in simple, single-celled organisms,
prokaryotes, is about 13 million nucleotides.[14]
Thus, there is a difference of at least 21 million
nucleotides between prokaryote organisms and humans. And for a single cell to evolve into a human,
the evolutionary process needs to mutate –which may include insertion– at least
21 million nucleotides with the correct nucleotide base and in the correct
sequence.
In genes, each amino acid –the building block of proteins
that are vital to all living processes– is coded for by 3 nucleotides, which is
called a codon. 21 million nucleotides
means 7 million codons.
Random mutations have one of three effects: Neutral, Deleterious
(harmful), or beneficial. Only
beneficial mutations can contribute to the evolutionary process.
In living organisms, there are 20 different amino acids and
a stop code,[15] thus, the total is
21.[16] Any mutation will lead to one of
these 20 amino acids or the stop code.[17]
Therefore, each mutation falling inside genes, the coding
region of the genome,[18] has a chance
of approximately 1/21 of not altering the amino acid (i.e. coding for the same
amino acid) and thus being a neutral mutation, and a chance of approximately
20/21 of altering the amino acid.[19]
70% of these 20/21 mutations are deleterious (harmful)
mutations.[20] Nevertheless, for the
sake of evolution, we will assume that all mutations which are altering amino
acids are beneficial mutations. Thus,
each mutation has a chance of approximately 20/21 of being beneficial.[21]
Therefore, the probability for 7 million codons to mutate
randomly with beneficial mutations is:
Chance of mutation for being beneficial to the power of Number of codons
20/21 to the power of
7 million
which equals 1 to more than 10100,000 (1 with 100,000 zeros
after it).[22]
Could natural selection have enhanced the chances of
mutations in our scenario? Never, since
what natural selection basically does is to sustain lineages with beneficial or
neutral mutations and to eliminate lineages with harmful mutations. Natural selection does not prevent beneficial
mutations from being mutated again.
Moreover, in our scenario, we have already assumed that all mutations
are either neutral or beneficial, and have ruled out harmful mutations. Thus, natural selection cannot do any better
in this scenario.
Conclusion
Therefore, we need more than 10100,000 (1 with 100,000 zeros
after it) random mutations to occur so that a simple, single-celled organisms
may evolve into a human, while we can only get less than 10110 (1 with 110
zeros after it) mutations during the age of the universe, even when the entire
universe is a stage for this evolutionary process.
All these
calculations were based on human genes –that constitute less than 2% of the
genome– without taking into consideration the junk region that consumes
approximately 98% of the human genome, which turned out not to be junk anymore. The ENCODE Project Consortium was able to
assign biochemical functions for 80% of the human genome and found that
approximately 20% of it regulates the genes.
The results of the five-year ENCODE project were published in 2012 in
the journals Nature, Science, Genome Biology and Genome Research.[23] The ENCODE consortium’s 442 researchers,
situated in 32 institutes around the world, used 300 years of computer time and
five years in the lab to get their results.
0 comment:
Enregistrer un commentaire